13 May 2016
Category: Claims
13 May 2016,

Wire Transfer email fraud

Title and settlement agents should always be aware of fraudulent email schemes that attempt to divert escrow funds to unauthorized accounts. Now, there’s a new wrinkle in cyberattacks hitting the title and settlement industry.

An independent escrow company in Southern California received a “legit-looking” email from a lender confirming two wire instructions for a total of $650,000. Instead of verifying the wire confirmations through the lender’s website, the escrow company took the word of the email.

The escrow company then disbursed off the confirmation sending $650,000 to a fraudulent account to a party that didn’t exist. Unfortunately, the email was a fake and the money was never there. One of the wires was recalled. Unfortunately, the second wire was not and the consumer lost $133,000.

“Title and settlement agents need to know that this can happen to them,” said Bill Burding, general counsel for Orange Coast Title. “When you get a wire confirmation from a lender, don’t disburse off it until you verify it on their website. Companies need a formalized policy of confirming disbursements online.”

Burding said title agents should call their lender if confirming wires online is not an option.

“If your bank doesn’t offer online verification, you shouldn’t be banking there,” he added.

Copyright © 2004-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.

This article has been used and reprinted with the permission of The American Land Title Association.  The material is for general information purposes only and is not to be relied upon or used for any particular purpose. Title Industry Assurance Company, RRG and The American Land Title Association shall not be held responsible in any way for, and specifically disclaims any liability arising out of or in any way connected to, reliance on or use of any of the information contained or referenced in this article. The information contained or referenced in this article is not intended to constitute and should not be considered legal or professional advice, nor shall it serve as a substitute for the recipient obtaining such advice.

Comments are closed.